Dawkins Runs for the Hen House!
Eugenie Scott Misrepresents the Law on Evolution Education http://www.evolutionnews.org/2011/07/eugenie_scott_misrepresents_th048621.html Press Release for J…
Video Rating: 2 / 5
Category: Hen House
About the Author (Author Profile)
Subscribe
If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to receive more just like it.
@TheScienceFoundation So I guess you don’t divide up the earth in
hemispheres? Nor do you use a compass since it implies a square earth? You
are just retarded, as in the literal definition some part of your brain
shuts down when you post on youtube, and its impossible for you to reason.
Cognitive dissonance perpetually flows out of you.
@TheScienceFoundation Actually there’s more evidence for creation than
ever. Especially with those living transition fossils, information,
complexity, irreducible complexity. Its much harder to support an
evolutionist view in the 21st century than in the 19th century. Also its
man catching up to the Bible, it meant that all along.
@orderslayer1 That passage says absolutely nothing close to what you’re
claiming and even if it did, that would only be a very good question to
prove the contradiction in the bible. I don’t know if you’re aware but a
strawman is a *mis*representation, not an accurate representation, which is
what I’ve provided Matthew 4:8 8 Again, the devil taketh him up into an
exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and
the glory of them All kingdoms from one point = flat.
@orderslayer1 ‘Nice little cutting of the sentence, its speaking of the
springs of the sea, not the springs to the sea.’ I don’t know if you
noticed, but it’s two different questions.
@TheScienceFoundation ‘A compass implies nothing, it evidences a magnetic
field, which itself is spherical. Wow three fallacies in one, projection,
red herring and ad hominem.’ I just find it hard to resist mocking.
Compasses are used for directions, on maps they show which is north etc.
Also the potters turntable shows this sphere.
@TheScienceFoundation why don’t you show all your pride and arrogance, and
your high and mighty knowledge, and respond? Without strawmanning and
stating baseless un-reasoned responses.
@TheScienceFoundation Why don’t you just say you cannot give a reasonable
answer aside from its really God writing the Bible. ‘you also derive the
completely unseen answer, in modern terms no less.’ do you know the answer
or not? I know it, and yes it takes very modern science. Took almost 4000
years for us to get to the technology of fiberoptics. Or maybe it was
simply revived technology, there is nothing new under the sun.
@TheScienceFoundation Umm considering this is a Christian account, and
you’re an atheist I would suspect you’re the troll since you were just
seeking trouble and to blather and but yet you obviously felt you’ve met
your match since you’ve just run out of supposed ideas.
@MsCoralline Should look up crytography, especially types which exist in
the Bible. You are wholly incompetent at theology as well, since the Bible
is rife with types such as Jonah, Abraham and Moses’ actions which are
types of Christ. But such complex things you cannot ever understand. Also
that’s a strawman since you seem to be confused with the occult
evolutionary pantheistic numerology. And supposedly you’ve got a
laboratory, and do science. this explains Academia so well.
@TheScienceFoundation really you have no knowledge of what the Bible
states, since actually it tells you how to interpret it. 2 Timothy 3:16 All
scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine,
for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: scripture
interprets scripture, and God means what He says, even if one’s finite
brain cannot grasp the subject or topic. One doesn’t read it via fleshly
eyes, but illuminated by the Holy Spirit.
@orderslayer1 You haven’t presented any science from the bible.
@orderslayer1 I just counted four apples on the table in my kitchen. Hm.
Interesting. How many times did I get up to pee last night? Two. This can’t
be coincidence! I happen to know that the sum of the first 23 primes is an
integer which is divisible by 23. Holy smokes! My cat is 22 years old. I
must be God. There’s absolutely *no* other explanation.
Just checking in to remind neutral viewers that all evolutionists are doing
in their comments are like chickens clucking.
@MsCoralline So you back down from the challenge. As a coward? Like most of
your ilk. Why don’t you prove how all of this is wrong then. And actually
this follows the basic formula of all experiments, hypothesis observations
and conclusion. Science means knowledge, and since this is more along the
lines of cryptology mixed in with mathematics. We aren’t even looking at
the Fibonacci numbers in the Bible, which also comes from mathematics.
Those who hate God love death” Proverbs 8:36
@TheScienceFoundation also why do you always try to shift the discussion
away when you’ve lost? Well since I lost that part, let’s just move on and
hope no body notices…
@orderslayer1 Now you’re just trying to shift the burden of proof. It’s not
mine to falsify claims that are not sufficiently evidenced.
@orderslayer1 what’s even more important about this truth of prophecy, is
that the Bible must therefore be existing outside of our time frame, or its
author must in order for such accurate depictions of the future to be true.
You won’t be able to grasp this but that means the Bible has
extra-terrestial, and extra-universal origin. Also why do you keep coming
back for more humiliation and a show of your ignorance?
More evo-chickens bawk bawk.
@orderslayer1 That’s a hard sell when the preceding passage talks about
grabbing the edges of the earth.
@TheScienceFoundation why don’t you show all your pride and arrogance, and
your high and mighty knowledge, and respond? Without strawmanning and
stating baseless un-reasoned responses.
@orderslayer1 now I have a challenge, how could the authors of the Bible,
who were probably unaware of cellular biology and many of these discoveries
only ‘occurred’ in the 20th century, know this? How did the book of Job
know about the rotation of the earth. Job 38:14, or the springs in the sea
only what 2 decades and still we are discovering more of these. Job 38:16.
Or fiberoptics in Job 38:35. Who else but the Creator could know these
things before their time?
@orderslayer1 also if you read all of Matthew, you’ll notice that Lucifer
brings Jesus higher and higher, as if to show his loftiness. Not only that
but this is a supernatural event. Jesus is also God, and thus is not
constrained by limitations of our perception. Lucifer also speaks of the
mount of the congregation, which might be the mount spoken of in this
passage, and that passage doesn’t sound like any place on earth. Also
scripture interprets scripture and Jesus is clear on the sphere.
Bereanbeacon: Do you even read any of the comments made on this page? Cluck
cluck, indeed baby . . . Now concentrate on getting your high school
diploma.
@orderslayer1 I’ve given the reasons, you keep invoking fallacy, bias and
ad hoc rationalization in order to reject them out of hand. You not wanting
to interpret as literal the passages that make the bible nonsensical is
irrelevant.
@orderslayer1 actually the mechanism is observation, does a house just form
out of rubble? Does a program just form out of a frizzled computer? Does a
spacecraft evolve from a paper air plane over time? How much more
ridiculous is it to state life itself, far more complex than all of these
combined is an act of random chance? Much less the laws of thermodynamics,
laws of information, laws of probability.